Propsed Rule Changes From the ACT
Posted: Wed 31 Mar 2004 1:01 am
Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs
2004 amendments proposed by ACTCA RAFT Committee
Rule No.1
Current Rule
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions which emulate as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
Proposed Rule
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions that would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
Rationale
Deleting the words “which emulate as closely as possible those which” does not change the spirit or intention of Rule No1, but does recognise the Trials in their current form do not emulate shooting conditions as closely as possible, which in turn would imply significantly shorter runs.
Rule No 2
Current Rule
All events shall be restricted to dogs six months of age and over. The age of all dogs is computed from the date of their birth to the date on which the trial commences. Should finalisation of the trial be delayed, then the increase in age shall not affect the eligibility of the qualified contestants.
Proposed Rule
All events shall be restricted to dogs six months of age and over. The age of a dog shall be computed from its date of birth to the date on which the Trial commences. Should finalisation of the Trial be delayed, then the increase in age shall not affect the eligibility of any qualified contestant.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.
Rule No 3
Current Rule
In these Rules "Gundogs and Retrievers" shall be taken as referring to all Pure Bred Gundog varieties as accepted by the Member Body. The word "dog" shall include both sexes.
Registered (Main and Limited) desexed Gundogs shall be permitted to compete in Retrieving Trials in all States and/or Territories of Australia.
Proposed Rule
Registered (Main and Limited) desexed Gundogs shall be permitted to compete in Retrieving Trials in all States and/or Territories of Australia.
Rationale
The first paragraph would be reworded and incorporated into Rule No 7 – Definitions, thereby clarifying Rule No1 and cleaning up Rule No3.
New Rule 7 (t)
Gundog - shall be taken to mean a registered pure bred dog of a variety accepted by a Member Body as a Gundog.
New Rule 7 (u)
Dog – shall be taken to mean a Gundog of either sex.
Rule No 4
Current Rule
Directives of a Member Body shall apply to a Retrieving Trial in that State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of National Trials, and in the event of any inconsistency the Rules of the ANKC shall apply.
At a National Retrieving Trial Championship the only Rules that shall apply are the Rules for the conduct of Retrieving Trials as approved by the ANKC.
Proposed Rule
Directives of a Member Body shall apply to Retrieving Trials in their State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of National Trials, and in the event of any inconsistency the Rules of the ANKC shall apply.
New Rule
At a National Retrieving Trial Championship the only Rules that shall apply are the Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs, as approved by the ANKC.
Rationale
The proposed change amplifies the distinction between local Rules and those applicable to the National Championship.
Rule No 5
Current Rule
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. He should sit quietly with handler, or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by his handler until sent to retrieve. When ordered a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground, and should deliver, tenderly to hand. He should then await further orders.
Proposed Rule
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. It should sit quietly with the handler or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by the handler, until sent to retrieve. When ordered a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground. It should deliver tenderly to hand and then await further orders from the handler.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.
Rule No 6
Current Rule
The Shooting and Game Laws of each State or Territory must be observed and will govern the conduct of all Trials in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations of each State or Territory Member Body.
Proposed Rule
The Shooting with Firearms and Game Laws of each State and/or Territory must be observed and will govern the conduct of all Trials in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations of each State or Territory Member Body and the ANKC.
Rationale
The proposed change clarifies the laws referred to, updates the language used and is consistent with the recommended changes to Rule No 4.
Rule No 7(c)
Current Rule
Breaking Fence - The act on the part of a dog, when walking to heel, of going through, over or under a fence, without order. All dogs should remain steady at both sides of the fence through or over which their handlers are crossing.
Proposed Rule
Breaking Fence – Is the act on the part of a dog, when walking to heel, of going through, over or under a fence, without order. A dog should remain steady at both sides of a fence through or over which its handler is crossing.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.
Rule No 7 (g)
Current Rule
Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge and Field Steward for the purpose of commencing a run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
Proposed Rule
Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge for the purpose of commencing a Run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
Rationale
A competitor is solely under the control of the Judge, see Rule No 58.
Rule No 7 (j)
Current Rule
Game - Definition of - Quail, Duck, Snipe, Rabbits, Hare, Pigeons and Pheasants. The game shown above shall include any imported game bird which may be released from time to time and has established itself in the wild.
Proposed Rule
Game – the game used in Trials may include native game including quail and duck and/or introduced game that has established itself in the wild in Australia including rabbits, hare, pigeon and pheasant.
Rationale
The current Rule does not provide a clear definition and reference to snipe has been removed since they can no longer be hunted in Australia.
Rule No 8
Current Rule
Single Mark Retrieve shall be a retrieve where only one object of game is cast and is to be retrieved.
Proposed Rule
A Mark Retrieve – is a retrieve in which an item game is cast, from concealed cover, so that it can be seen by the dog while it is in the air and as it falls. A Mark Retrieve may be on land or in and/or through water. On a Mark Retrieve a dog should not need direction from its handler once it has been sent to recover game.
Rationale
The proposed changes raise the profile of the definition to address the current latitude in the interpretation of Rule 24.
Rule No 9
Current Rule
A Walk-Up Retrieve is one where the dog is walking at heel, the game is cast and shot at. Immediately the handler pauses to fire, the dog shall sit, drop or stand steady until ordered by handler to retrieve. A walk up is not permitted in a Novice or Puppy Stake or a Beginners Test.
Proposed Rule
A Walk-Up Retrieve is a Mark Retrieve wherein the game is cast while the dog is walking at heel. Immediately the handler pauses to fire at the game, the dog shall sit, stand or drop and remain steady until ordered by its handler to retrieve. A Walk-up Retrieve is not permitted in a Puppy Stake or a Beginners Test. In Novice Stakes the cast and fall of the game should generally be in line with the direction the handler has been directed to walk.
Rationale
The proposed wording emphasises that this retrieve is a variant of a Mark Retrieve and that its reintroduction into Novice Stakes is not inconsistent with a capabilities of a well trained Novice dog.
Rule No 10 (a)
Current Rule
Wounded Bird Retrieve - Bird to be thrown by Steward as in other retrieves, but to have line attached by which it is dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. Bird then picked up and fresh bird left in its stead.
Proposed Rule
Wounded Bird Retrieve – A bird to which a line has been attached is cast as in a Mark Retrieve. The bird is subsequently dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. This bird then picked up by a Steward and a fresh bird left in its stead for the dog to later retrieve.
Rationale
The proposed wording seeks to clarify the conduct of this type of retrieve. That said the ACTCA RAFT believes that this type of retrieve should be deleted since it is not possible to maintain an ambit of equality for all dogs as items of game a repeatedly dragged over the same ground. If the balance of option is to retain this style of retrieve it should be seen as a test of steadiness rather than a tracking test.
Rule 10(b)
Current Rule
Wounded Rabbit Retrieve - Rabbit to be placed by Steward as in other retrieves, but to have line attached by which it is dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. Rabbit is then picked up and fresh rabbit left in its stead.
Proposed Rule
Wounded Rabbit Retrieve – Rabbit, to which a line has been attached, is placed at a location nominated by the Judge. The rabbit is subsequently dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. This rabbit is then picked up by a Steward up and a fresh rabbit left in its stead for the dog to later recover.
Rationale
The proposed wording seeks to clarify the conduct of this type of retrieve. That said the ACTCA RAFT believes that this type of retrieve should be deleted since it is not possible to maintain an ambit of equality for all dogs as items of game a repeatedly dragged over the same ground. If the balance of option is to retain this style of retrieve then it should be seen as a test of steadiness rather than a tracking test and appropriate words should be added to the Rule to reflect this view.
Rule 11
Current Rule
A Blind Find Retrieve shall be a retrieve where a dog is in such a position that the flight, fall or placement of the game cannot be seen. The Judge may direct the dog to be placed behind a hide in close proximity to the Firing Point. Where possible it is recommended that the hide be part of the natural terrain or be constructed of natural materials.
Proposed Rule
A Blind Find Retrieve shall be a retrieve where a dog is in such a position that the flight, fall or placement of the game cannot be seen. The Judge may direct the dog to be placed behind a hide in close proximity to the Firing Point. Where possible it is recommended that the hide be part of the natural terrain or alternatively man-made portable hides should be used. .
Rationale
Natural hides require destruction of vegetation or modification of trials sites, which we should be seeking to avoid. Hay bails or cloth hides are adequate and emulate a hunting situation.
Rule No 12
Current Rule
A Double Mark Retrieve shall consist of two (2) marked retrieves and may include land and water. Except where the game is cast in a common area, game shall not be cast simultaneously and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Proposed Rule
A Double Mark Retrieve shall consist of two (2) Mark Retrieves and may include land and water. Except where the game is cast in a common area, game shall not be cast simultaneously and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Rationale
Editorial change to incorporate consistent terminology.
Rule No 13
Current Rule
A Double Blind Retrieve. The game will be located as in a double mark, with the game being placed so that the dog cannot sight them.
Proposed Rule
A Double Blind Find Retrieve. Two items of game will be separately located as for a Blind Find Retrieve and angular separation between the two items of game shall be at least 10 degrees in the case of All Age and Championship Stakes and at least 45 degrees in a Restricted Stake.
Rationale
The distances and lines that are acceptable for a Double Mark Retrieve are not the same for a Double Blind Find Retrieve. A certain minimum separation needs to be defined so that the two items of game cannot effectively be in line. This separation needs to be considerably wider in Restricted so the dog is being asked to look in a substantially different direction for each blind.
Rule No14
Current Rule
A Double Rise Retrieve shall consist of a retrieve where one object of game is cast and two shots fired in succession, before the dog is sent to retrieve and whilst the dog is returning with game, another object of game is cast or placed no further than approximately ten (10) metres from the fall of the game but at a greater distance form the firing point. The second game shall be retrieved immediately after the first game is delivered to hand. The second leg should not be treated as a blind.
Proposed Rule
A Double Rise Retrieve shall consist of a retrieve where one item of game is cast as for a Mark Retrieve at which two shots are fired in quick succession and before the dog is sent to retrieve. While the dog is returning with the first item of game, a second item of game is cast or placed approximately ten (10) metres from the fall of the first item of game, but at a greater distance from the Firing Point. The second item of game shall be retrieved immediately after the first item of game is delivered to hand. The second leg should not be treated as a Blind Find Retrieve.
Rationale
Large editorial changes and use of consistent terminology
Rule No 15
Current Rule
A Two-Bird Retrieve. First game is cast from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While dog is returning to handler with game, the second game is cast and a shot fired, so that the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The second game should be at least twenty metres from first game and not less than forty metres from the firing point.
Proposed Rule
A Two-Bird Retrieve. The first item of game shall be cast as for a Mark Retrieve, or alternatively, it may be cast or placed as for a Blind Find Retrieve. In accordance with instructions from the Judge, the dog shall be sent to recover this item of game. While dog is returning to the handler with the first item of game, a second item of game shall be cast so that the dog may mark its fall. The second item of game should be at least twenty metres from first item of game and not less than forty metres from the firing point.
Rationale
The amended working permits the first item of game to be recovered to be either a Mark Retrieve or a Blind Find Retrieve.
Rule No 16
Current Rule
Double Fall Retrieve. First game is cast as a mark from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve, the second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The first game cast must be retrieved before the second. The second game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line of the first and not less than forty metres from the firing point. This retrieve is restricted to “All Age” and "Championship Stakes".
Proposed Rule
Double Fall Retrieve. The first item of game is cast as a Mark Retrieve and at which one shot is fired. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve the first item of game, a second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of this item of game. The first item of game must be retrieved before the second item of game. The second item of game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line to the first item of game and not less than forty metres from the Firing Point. This retrieve is limited to All Age and Championship Stakes.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity.
Rule No 17
Current Rule
A Mark and Blind Retrieve shall consist of one marked retrieve and one blind find and may include land and water.
Proposed Rule
A Mark and Blind Retrieve shall consist of one Mark Retrieve and one Blind Find Retrieve.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No18
Current Rule
A Triple Mark shall consist of three marked retrieves. The game may be thrown at different angles and should be at least twenty metres apart and include land and water, terrain permitting. One retrieve should be at a fairly short distance. Game shall not be cast simultaneously, and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Proposed Rule
A Triple Mark shall consist of three separate Mark Retrieves. The items of game may be cast at different angles and shall be at least twenty metres apart and may include land and water, terrain permitting. One retrieve should be at a fairly short distance. Items of game shall not be cast simultaneously, and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No 19
Current Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Blinds and one Marked shall consist of two blind retrieves as for a Double and one marked retrieve.
Proposed Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Blinds and one Mark shall consist of a Double Blind Find Retrieve and a Mark Retrieve.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No 20
Current Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Marked and one Blind as previously described.
Proposed Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Marks and one Blind shall consist of a Double Mark Retrieve and a Blind Find Retrieve.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.
Rule No 21
Current Rule
Through or Amongst Decoy Retrieves. No less than six decoys constructed of plastic or painted wood shall be used. The decoys should be anchored individually. Any dog that picks up a decoy and does not immediately release it without command shall be marked no score. A dog which becomes entangled in the strings and attempts to free itself should not be penalised.
Proposed Rule
Through or Amongst Decoy Retrieves. No less than six decoys, constructed of plastic or painted wood, shall be used. The decoys should be anchored individually. Any dog that picks up a decoy and does not immediately release it without command shall be marked with No Score. A dog which becomes entangled in the strings and attempts to break free shall not be penalised.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity.
Rule No 22
Current Rule
On multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order of retrieving. Any reasonable combination of the listed retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any retrieve.
Note: The direction to the Game Steward to cast the game shall be given by the Judge. Where applicable, such direction shall be given from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.
Proposed Rule
In multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order in which items of game shall be recovered. Any reasonable combination of the listed Retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any Run.
New Rule
The direction to the Game Steward to cast the game shall be given by the Judge. Where applicable, such direction shall be given from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.
Rule No 23 (a)
Current Rule
In Championship and All Age Stakes, a judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast, which is not to be retrieved by the competing dog.
Proposed Rule
In All Age and Championship Stakes, a Judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast as a diversion and this item of game shall not be retrieved by the competing dog. Items of game used as a diversion shall not be located either “in line” with or at a distance of less than 20m from an item of game that is to be retrieved. See Rule “?” for the definition of “in line”.
Rationale
Largely editorial but also seeks to clarify the conditions under which a diversionary item of game may be used.
Rule No 23 (b)
Current Rule
If any dog at any time picks up an article of game other than the nominated one it should be eliminated from further competition.
Proposed Rule
While in competition, if a dog picks up an item of game used in connection with the Trial, other than the nominated item of game, it shall be awarded No Score. In the event of a dog picking up an item of game not being used in connection with the test, it shall be given a re-run without penalty.
Rationale
Clarifies what is meant by the term “eliminated” and overcomes shortfalls in the current wording of Rule No 90, which should be deleted.
Rule No 24
Current Rule
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 24.
Rationale
Rule No 8 adequately describes the requirements for a Mark Retrieve.
Rule No 26
Current Rule
On Marked Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the judge and may be considered a test of control, i.e. a handling test.
Proposed Rule
On Mark Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the Judge and this aspect may be considered to be a test of control. Prior to sending the dog, a handler is permitted to indicate clearly to the dog which item of game it is to recover and further handling should be penalised accordingly.
Rationale
Multiple Mark Retrieves should not be treated by the handler as though they are multiple Blind Find Retrieves, but the Rule, as it now stands, could be seen to imply this. The present wording is open to misinterpretation.
Rule No 28
Current Rule
On Blind Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Retrieve on the initial line from his handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period cannot be said to be under control.
Proposed Rule
On Blind Find Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Find Retrieve on the initial line from its handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Find Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period of time cannot be said to be under control.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.
Rule No 29
Current Rule
Programmes must be so arranged that all dogs are thoroughly tested on land and in or through water of sufficient depth to require the dog to swim.
Proposed Rule
Programmes should be so arranged that all dogs are thoroughly tested on land and in or through water of sufficient depth to require the dog to swim.
Rationale
“Must” has been replaced with “should” to provide Judges with some degree of latitude in cases where water levels are low due to drought or when trials are conducted in flooded paddocks.
Rule No 30
Current Rule
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. It is desirable in a Novice Stake that runs be not more than 100 metres.
Proposed Rule
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. In a Novice Stake it is desirable that Runs not exceed 100 metres.
Rationale
Grammatical and editorial changes to improve clarity.
Rule No 31
Current Rule
No more than two (2) retrieves judged by the same judge may be run jointly.
Proposed Rule
No more than two (2) Runs judged by the same person/s may be linked as consecutive tests.
Rationale
Editorial changes to improve clarity.
Rule No 32
Current Rule
A "Stake" is a competition held at a Retrieving Trial and shall consist of not less than three (3) retrieves, with the exception of Puppy Stakes, which shall consist of two (2) retrieves. A Novice Stake shall consist of not less than three retrieves or more than four retrieves.
Proposed Rule
A "Stake" is a competition held at a Retrieving Trial and shall consist of not less than three (3) Runs, , with the exception of a Beginners Test, which shall consist of two (2) retrieves. A Novice Stake shall consist of not less than three Runs or more than four Runs.
Rationale
Age based Stakes are not viable in the Australian environment and should be deleted and replaced with a progression of events e.g. commencing with a Beginners Test, followed by a Novice Stake, a Restricted Stake, an All Age Stake and a Championship Stake.
Rule No 33
Current Rule
Puppy Stake is a stake confined to all Gundogs six (6) months of age and not exceeding twelve (12) months as at the date of the event.
Proposed Rule
Beginners Test is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won another Beginners Test or have placed in any other Stake. Beginners' Tests shall consist of two (2) Runs each of which is a Mark Retrieve, one (1) on land and one (1) in or through water.
Rationale
See Rationale attached to Rule No 32 above and this wording embraces Rule No 45 which should, as a consequence, be deleted.
Rule No 34
Current Rule
Novice Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have not won any stake other than two (2) Novice Stakes, Puppy Stakes and ‘Beginners' Tests excluded. A "Walk Up'' is not permitted in a Novice or Puppy Stake or Beginners' Test.
Proposed Rule
Novice Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won two (2) Novice Stakes (Beginners’ Tests excluded). A “Walk up” is permitted in a Novice Stake as per Rule 9.
Rationale
Changes in the 1st sentence are to make the eligibility requirements clearer. The second sentence is changed to align the Rule Book with our proposed change to
Rule No 9.
Rule No 35
Current Rule
Derby Stake is a stake confined to all Gundogs six (6) months of age and not exceeding two (2) years as at the date of the event.
Note: Work for Derby Stakes must not include blind finds. Work for Novice and Puppy Stakes must be single-marked retrieves, and importance must be placed on arranging runs with clear marking. All events shall be restricted to dogs six (6) months or over.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule 35 in its entirety.
Rationale
Age based Stakes are not viable in the Australian environment and should be deleted and replaced with a progression of events e.g. commencing with a Beginners Test, followed by a Novice Stake, a Restricted Stake, an All Age Stake and a Championship Stake.
Rule No 36
Current Rule
Restricted Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have not won three (3) Restricted Stakes or an All Age Stake or been placed first or second in a Championship Stake.
Proposed Rule
Restricted Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won five (5) Restricted Stakes or an All Age Stake or been placed first or second in a Championship Stake. At least one Blind Find Retrieve shall be included in a Restricted Stake. It is preferable that the Blind Find Retrieve should be completed after, rather than before, a Mark Retrieve, Double Rise or Two-Bird Retrieve. In the same Run, if a Blind Find is to be completed ahead of a Mark Retrieve, the angle of separation between the two items of game shall not be less than 45 degrees.
Rationale
There is a significant gap between the levels of performance expected of All Age dogs and those competing at Restricted Stake level. Competitors from States experiencing low entry numbers are finding that dogs are being forced to compete at All Age level before they have gained sufficient experience. Increasing the number of permissible wins is seen as viable approach to allow these dogs to gain the requisite experience. The requirement for three (3) Restricted Stake wins for a dog to gain its RRD title would be retained so competitors in States with larger entries will not be significantly disadvantaged. An angular separation of 45 degrees is considered more than adequate for dogs of this standard.
Rule No 37
Current Rule
All Age Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have won a Novice or have been placed first, second or third in a Restricted Stake. A blind find must be included.
Proposed Rule
All Age Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have won a Novice Stake or have been placed first, second or third in a Restricted Stake. A Blind Find Retrieve must be included and the number of Runs shall not exceed four (4).
Rationale
Some States are conducting Championship events limited to four Runs and at the same time some Club’s are conducting All Age events with up to five (5) Runs. This imbalance can distort the perception of the relative performance of the winning dogs.
Rule No 38
Current Rule
Championship Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have been placed first in a Restricted or first, second or third in an All Age Stake. A Championship Stake shall consist of not less than four (4) retrieves, with at least nine (9) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) blind finds are to be included.
A dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide at least once.
Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits and at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship.
Proposed Rule
Championship Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have been placed first in a Restricted Stake or first, second or third in an All Age Stake. A Championship Stake shall consist of not less than six (6) Runs, with at least thirteen (13) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) Blind Find Retrieves shall be included and a dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a Hide on at least one occasion during the course of the event.
Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits, at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship Stake.
Rationale
The increase in the minimum number of Runs is designed to establish a clear distinction between All Age and Championship Stakes.
Rule No 39
Current Rule
Retrieving Trial Champions are eligible only for Championship. All Age and Derby Stakes.
Proposed Rule
Retrieving Trial Champions are eligible only for Championship and All Age Stakes.
Rationale
Editorial change and the amendment wording is in keeping with the recommendation to delete Derby Stakes in their entirety.
Rule No 40
Current Rule
National Championship Retrieving Trial shall consist of not less than seven (7) retrieves with at least fifteen (15) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) blinds are to be included.” A retrieve containing a blind find "leg" is not acceptable unless the dog is tested for steadiness from behind a hide.
A dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide at least twice.
Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits and at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship.
No other Retrieving Trial carrying Championship points may be conducted throughout Australia on the same day as a National Championship Retrieving Trial.
Proposed Rule
National Championship Retrieving Trial shall consist of not less than eight 8 Runs with at least seventeen 17 items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) Blind Find Retrieves are to be included and a dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide on at least two (2) occasions. .
Note: A minimum of twelve (12) bona fide exhibits and at least eight 8 different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a National Championship.
No other Retrieving Trial carrying Championship points may be conducted throughout Australia on the same day as a National Championship Retrieving Trial.
Rationale
The increase in the minimum number of Runs and items of game to be retrieved is designed to establish a clear distinction between a Championship Stake and a National Championship Retrieving Trial.
Rule No 41
Current Rule
Brace Stake is a stake for two (2) dogs of different breeds or two (2) dogs of the same breed, provided they are registered Gundogs and the bona fide property of the one (1) owner.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 41 in its entirety.
Rationale
A Brace Stake is not relevant in the Australian environment.
Rule No 42
Current Rule
Team Stake is a stake for three (3) dogs of the same or different breeds provided they are the bona fide property of the one (1) owner.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 42 in its entirety
Rationale
A Team Stake is not relevant in the Australian environment.
Rule No 45
Current Rule
Beginners' Tests - Are tests provided for dogs that have never been placed in any Stake or which have never won any other Beginners' Test or Water Test.
Beginners' Tests shall consist of two (2) single-marked retrieves, one (1) on land and one (1) in or through water.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 45 in its entirety
Rationale
Context included in proposed changes to Rule No 33.
Rules 46-47-48-49-50 each relate to Water Tests
Current Rules Nos.
46. A Water Test shall consist of two (2) retrieves, one (1) to be from water and one (1) across water and both to be single-marked retrieves.
47. Novice Water Test is a test for dogs which have not won any Water Test or Retrieving Trial Stake or been placed first or second in a Retrieving Trial Championship Stake (Beginners’ Test excluded).
48. Restricted Water Test is a test for dogs which have not won an All Age Water test or an All Age Stake Retrieving Trial or have been place first or second in a Championship Stake Retrieving Trial.
49 All Age Water Test is a test for dogs without restriction to age or previous performance, except that Retrieving Trial Champions cannot compete.
50. Any Judge holding a Novice Licence or higher shall be eligible to judge any Water Test.
Proposed Rule
The proposal is to delete Rules 46-50 inclusive.
Rationale
These events are rarely staged and no longer serve a useful purpose. Their deletion would bring the Rule book into line with alterations to other Field Trial rules, which have had irrelevant material removed.
Rule No 56
Current Rule
No owner or handler shall be permitted to withdraw a dog from a stake on the field or at any time during the progress of the stake, without the consent of the Judge, and without advising a Steward. Any owner or handler withdrawing his dog or dogs without such consent may be debarred from any further Trials or penalised according to the circumstances by the Committee of the Member Body.
Proposed Rule
No owner or handler shall be permitted to withdraw a dog from a Stake or at any time during the progress of the Stake, without the consent of the Judge (which will not be unreasonably withheld) and without advising a Steward. Any owner or handler withdrawing a dog or dogs without consent may be debarred from any further Trials or penalised according to the circumstances by the Committee of the Member Body.
Rationale
As a matter of courtesy an owner and/or handler should seek the Judge’s permission to withdraw any dog from a Stake, similarly, the Judge should not be in a position to deny such a request. For example, a handler may be concerned for the safety of the dog in a particular Run and therefore wish to withdraw the dog from further competition. It is undesirable to have a situation whereby the Judge could deny such a request.
Rule No 66
Current Rule
The person handling and hunting a dog may speak, whistle, and work it by hand as he may deem proper, but he may be called to order by the Judge for making any unnecessary noise or for any disorderly conduct, and if after being cautioned he persists in such noise or disorderly conduct, the Judge may order the dog to be taken up and it then shall be regarded as disqualified from the stake. An opponent's dog must not be interfered with or excited.
Proposed Rule
The person handling a dog may speak, whistle, and work it by hand as they deem proper, including using a hand to indicate to the dog which item of game it is to retrieve, but may be called to order by the Judge for making any unnecessary noise or for any disorderly conduct, and if after being cautioned they persist with such noise or disorderly conduct, the Judge may order the dog to be taken up and it then shall be regarded as being disqualified from the Stake.
Rationale
Dogs are not “hunted” in a Retrieving Trial and the revised wording further clarifies the situation of when a handler elects to use a hand cue to indicate to the dog which item of game it is to retrieve.
Rule No 86
Current Rule
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay shall return direct to the handler and shall deliver straight to hand in front of the handler from standing or sitting position, and as instructed by the Judge. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.
Proposed Rule
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay return directly to the handler and shall deliver, within hand’s reach of the handler (e.g. in front of or at the handler’s side), from standing or sitting position. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.
Rationale
Dog’s should be allowed to deliver anywhere within a tight semi-circle from the left to the right side heeling position of the handler. While delivering to the side, dogs often demonstrate that they have remembered the location of other game by aligning themselves in the relevant direction.
Rule No 103
Current Rule
The title of Novice Retrieving Trial Dog (N.R.D.) and/or Restricted Retrieving Trial Dog (R.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs which are no longer eligible to compete in those stakes because of wins in those stakes or wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule will be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)
Proposed Rule
The title of Novice Retrieving Trial Dog (N.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs that are no longer eligible to compete in Novice Stakes because of wins in those Stakes or wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule will be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)
New Rule
The Restricted Retrieving Trial Dog (R.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs that have won three (3) Restricted Stakes or are no longer eligible to compete at this level because of wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule shall be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)
Rationale
In the interests of advancing the sport and to assist handlers and/or dogs gain additional experience before being excluded from competing at Restricted level, it has been recommended (see proposed Rule No 36) that the total number of Restricted wins be increased to five (5). Nevertheless, it is felt that the number of wins at Restricted level necessary to gain the RRD Title should not be increased fro the current criteria.
Rule No 113
Current Rule
Judges shall not show their sheets to any unauthorised person. The sheets must be retained by the judge. Judge's Sheets must be checked and signed by the Judge and Chief Steward and the points announced for all place awards at the conclusion of the Trial.
Should any competitor request details of how he was scored on any retrieve, the judge may make this information available to that competitor. The Judge may, at his discretion, show a competitor his/her score sheet.
Proposed Rule
Judges shall not show their sheets to unauthorised persons. The sheets must be retained by the Judge. Judge's Sheets must be checked and signed by the Judge and Chief Steward and at the conclusion of the Trial and the aggregate points shall be announced for all place awards.
As a minimum, at the conclusion of the presentation of trophies, the Run by Run scores of all dogs completing the Trial shall be made available to interested parties.
Should any competitor failing to complete the Trial request details of how he/she was scored on any Run, the Judge shall make this information available to that competitor. The Judge may, at his discretion, show a competitor his/her score sheet.
Rationale
Under current Rules and practice, a Retrieving Trial is possibly the only competition in Australia where a competitor’s progress throughout the Trial is known only to the Judge. It is considered that the sport would benefit from adopting a more transparent approach. This could be achieved by making the Run by Run scores of all competitors completing the Trial available for the information of interested parties. The proposed approach does not create any additional work on behalf of the Judge or Officials since the scores of all competitors completing the Trial are routinely tallied in order to establish the final outcome of the Trial.
New Rule
Items of game shall be considered to be “in line” when the angle of separation is less than 11 degrees. In practical terms, 11 degrees equates to a 10 metre separation at a distance of 50 metres; a 20 metre separation at a distance of 100 metres and a 30 metre separation at a distance of 150 metres. The Judge shall not specify the order of pick-up if items of game are deemed to be “in line” and that decision shall be left to the handler’s discretion.
Rationale
It is considered that in situations where items of game are deliberately cast or placed “in line” and the Judge specifies that the “back” item of game is to be retrieved first, the scenario calls for levels of control that are outside the spirit of the sport. There is a widely held view that Runs of this type are designed to eliminate competitors rather than to produce fair competition that can be assessed in an appropriate manner and suitable safeguards are required.
Proposed Change to Score Sheet
Change
Amend the Score Sheet to include a new category entitled “Breaking from the Hide” with a deduction of up to 5 points.
Rationale
Over time this misdemeanour has not been treated in a consistent manner by all Judges and has been assessed under a variety of categories including; Steadiness, Obedience and Walking to Heel; Breaking to Shot and Failure to Obey Command and Direction. Creating a dedicated category is seen as an appropriate solution this dilemma. The recommendation that the penalty be limited to a maximum of 5 points was reached after considering the relative importance of;
a. Breaking to Shot - max 10 points
b. Hard mouth - max 10 points
c. Blinking and over-running game - max 5 points
d. Dropping game - max 5 points, and
e. Not firing from the shoulder - max 5 points
Breaking from the hide, either before or after the shot is fired (but before the dog is called by the handler), is assessed as a lesser fault than a. and b. above and more in keeping with faults c, d, and e.
Restructure of the Rule Book
In its present form related Rules are not always presented together and this makes for difficult reading and understanding, particularly for new-comers to the sport. A number of Rules include Notes and their status in not clear. Perhaps they should be made into separate and distinct Rules.
Reordering the Rules Book along the following lines is recommended and bringing it to fruition may require a Working Party to be established in which the ACTCA is filling to participate.
Purpose (Rules 1, 5, 27, 4, and 6)
Definition of Terms (Rule 7)
Retrieves (Rules 8, 24, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 30, 22, 26, 29, 23, 25, 26, 28, 31)
Stakes and Eligibility (Rules 2, 3, 32, 45, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, 44)
Required entries (Rules 51, notes 38, and 40)
Judges (Rules 111, 71, 72, 73,)
Duties of Trial manager and stake managers (Rule 92)
Duties of Gun steward (Rule 93f)
Duties of Game stewards (Rule 93a-e,g)
General Regulations for Conduct of a Trial (Rules 52, 60, 58, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75)
Procedure for Conducting Trials (Rules 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91),
Method of Scoring (Rules 112, 113, 114, Score Sheet)
Awards (Rules 110b, 110a, 97, 98, 99, 110, 101, 102, 94, 95, 104, 105, 106)
Titles (Rules 103, 107, 108, 109).
New Rule
The title of RT Grand Champion may be awarded to any dog that is awarded at total of 120 Championship points, of which not less than eighteen 18 have been awarded in Championship Stakes.
The title of RT Grand Championship will not be awarded to dogs retrospectively, but a dog will be eligible to be awarded the title of RT Grand Champion, if it gains a minimum of twelve (12) points towards the title of RT Grand Champion (120 points) on or after the implementation date of 1.1.2005.
Rationale
To place Retrieving Trial titles on a comparable to those in the “conformation world” and is a just and fitting reward for outstanding achievement in the field. The requirement to gain at least eighteen points in Championship Stakes requires significant merit and ensures that the title of RT Grand Champion will not be obtained simply because a Member State has fewer dogs in competition.
Document entitled “Guidelines for Judges”
For some time there has been considerable interest in having developed a document containing a series of guidelines for Judges. The ACTCA RAFT has responded to this need and the following draft document is attached for consideration and implementation. It is acknowledged that it will be extremely difficult to gain universal acceptance of every facit contained in the draft document, nevertheless, it should be recognised that its contents are only “guidelines” and do not alter, or in any other way impact on, the official ANKC Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs. The guidelines are there to promote a level of consistency across the country in the conduct of Trials, the standard of Runs, interpretations of the Rules and the principles underpinning the assessment of the performance of dogs in competition.
It may be necessary for the National RAFT Committee to establish a Working Party to bring together the final document. Members of the Working Party will need to be computer literate and have ready access to the appropriate resources, if the “Guidelines for Judges” document is to be finalised before 1 Jan 2005.
RETRIEVING TRIALS FOR GUNDOGS
Guidelines for Judges
Preamble
Directives issued by a Member Body shall apply to a Retrieving Trial in that State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of the National Trial, but in the event of any inconsistency, the Rules of the ANKC shall apply. At a National Retrieving Trial Championship only the ANKC Rules shall apply. Consequently, nothing contained in these Guidelines shall be considered as altering and/or amending the ANKC Rules in any way whatsoever. Recommendations relating to the interpretation and application of the Rules are therefore for guidance purposes aimed at promoting increased uniformity in the conduct of Retrieving Trials and the impartial assessment of the competitors.
The objectives of these Guidelines are twofold:
Firstly, to promote greater uniformity in the conduct of Retrieving Trials, including the standard of Runs set in the various Stakes; and
Secondly, to facilitate greater uniformity in how Judge’s assess the relative merits of dogs competing in Retrieving Trials. In respect to evaluating a dog’s performance, these Guidelines include a set of recommendations for grading the performance of dogs so that there will be greater uniformity in the penalties imposed for various faults.
Recommendations
ANKC Rule No 1 states;
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions which emulate as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
The phrase, “conditions which emulate as closely as possible to those which would be found whilst shooting” should be interpreted for the purposes of the Rules as “natural hunting conditions”. At all times Judges should be mindful of the requirement to “bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.” This includes, as far as is practical, ensuring that there are no significant changes in the colour of game especially that used for “marked retrieves”. Judges are encouraged to oversee the sorting of game in order to circumvent any difficulties that may arise and to maximize the “ambit of equality”.
.
ANKC Rule No 5 states;
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. It should sit quietly with the handler or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by its handler until sent to retrieve. When ordered, a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground, and should deliver, tenderly to hand. It should then await further orders.
ANKC Rule No 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from its handler.
ANKC Rule No 27 states;
A dog that marks the fall of a bird, used the wind, and will take direction from his handler is of great value.
Perhaps more than any others, Rule Nos 5 and 27 encapsulate the necessity for team work between handler and dog. A dog that has marked the fall of game and been sent to retrieve should, in general terms, require no further direction from the handler (ref ANKC Rule No 24). Deductions from a perfect score should be commensurate with the deficiencies shown in marking and memory.
Judges should be discouraged from setting Runs which are aimed at discounting the need for teamwork by consciously locating handlers in positions where they cannot help their dog. “Natural hunting conditions” are subject to great variation across the length and breadth of Australia, the work expected of dogs should not be subject to similar wide variations. In most instances, there should be little doubt in anyone’s mind as to the type of work that constitutes a perfect performance on any given Run. Nevertheless, there are unlimited opportunities for honest difference-of-opinion on the severity of the penalty to be applied to any given infraction or deviation from perfect work.
The possibility therefore exists for handlers to become confused and/or dismayed when their dog is not included in the placings due to faults, which a Judge in another Trial did not penalise so severely. However, this should be minimized, as everyone has the right to know which particular faults will be penalised severely, moderately, or only to a minor degree. It therefore follows that some clarification and/or guidance is required; hence, a variety of faults and their suggested classifications may be found at the back of this Guide.
ANKC Rule 7 (a) states;
Action and Style - These are both seen in a fearless, well-trained dog that covers its ground with good free movement, head well held, and tail swinging nicely from side to side.
The style and capabilities of each particular breed should be taken into account when making an assessment. Action and Style do not relate to speed alone. The assessment should take into account factors such as; how keen and willing is the dog to work with its handler and to promptly accept commands, how keen and willing is the dog to perform the act of retrieving.
ANKC Rule 7 (b) states;
Blinking - Any dog that finds and deliberately passes by the game, either through nervousness or bad training is a "blinker".
A dog that blinks game and then begins to hunt in the wrong area should be penalized 1 - 5 points. Indicators such as the dog pausing over game and looking back toward the handler should be used by the Judge to confirm that game has been ignored. The Judge must be certain in his/her mind that blinking has in fact occurred before applying the penalty and it is not simply a case of misjudgement by the dog or the Judge.
ANKC Rule 7 (d) states;
Breaking from the Hide - A dog will be deemed to have broken from the hide if he moves outside the area designated by the Judge as the hide. Any movement by the dog within the area of the hide shall be classed as unsteadiness only.
If a dog breaks from the hide to a position where it would be able to see the game placed, cast, or the handler firing at the game and is then replaced before the shot is fired – apply 5 point penalty.
Breaking to Shot from a Hide - if a dog breaks from the hide before a shot is fired, it is should be seen as being less steady than a dog that waits in the hide until it hears a shot (or two in the case of a Double Blind) and then breaks. It would therefore seem inconsistent to increase the penalty for this infraction over that discussed immediately above. By definition, there has been no attempt to retrieve (only to rejoin the handler) – apply a 5 point penalty.
If a dog moves from the hide, but stops in an area not insight of the handler or of game being cast or placed – may be returned to the hide and a deduction for unsteadiness would be applied – apply a penalty of 3 Points.
A dog moving from hide position before the shot is fired may be repositioned once only.
If a dog comes out of the hide and sees the blind being placed or game cast and is deemed to have gained an unfair advantage, it should be disqualified.
ANKC Rule 7 (e) states;
Breaking to Shot - If a dog makes a forward movement which in the opinion of the Judge indicates a deliberate attempt to retrieve without being ordered to do so, that dog shall be deemed to have broken. If a dog makes a slight break and is brought immediately under control it shall be penalised for unsteadiness.
Controlled Break - up to 5 points deduction (dog stopped in the field and redirected).
If the dog breaks and continues to retrieve – 10 point deduction.
ANKC Rules 7 (f, g& i) collectively state;
f) Control Area - is that area encompassed by the control point markers and the firing point markers.
g) Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge and Field Steward for the purpose of commencing a run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
i) Firing Point - is the point from which the handler will fire a gun and direct the dog to retrieve.
Note: Terrain permitting, the distance between the Control Point and the Firing Point shall be not less than ten metres and the distance between the two marker pegs at the Firing Point shall be not less than 1.5 metres.
Judges are encouraged to be very specific in their briefing to handlers on where they are to control their dog.
Handlers moving either forward or backward from the Firing Point should be penalized, accordingly, and this may even lead to receiving a zero score (No Score) – if it is deemed to be an attempt to gain an unfair advantage.
A dog that picks up a previously retrieved item of game prior to being sent for the next leg of a retrieve – 5 point penalty
N.B. A previously retrieved item of game refers to game retrieved by the dog in the current Run and not items of game that have been retrieved in other Runs and that have inadvertently been left where the dog may be tempted to retrieve them.
ANKC Rule No 7 (l) states;
Hard Mouth - A dog is deemed to be hard-mouthed when there is unmistakable evidence of any markings or damage on game retrieved due to biting or crunching by the dog. The penalty as defined on the score sheet should be relative to the marking or damage. Where there is deliberate squeezing of game so that the bones break and the Judge considers that the game is unfit for the table, the Judge may apply Rule 58 and disqualify the dog.
Note: Game can be marked when thrown and this should be considered.
A dog should be penalised for hard-mouth (damaging game), but, before doing so, the Judge should inspect the bird and be satisfied that the dog alone is responsible for the damage.
"Hard-mouth" is one of the most severely penalized faults in a retriever; furthermore, once a dog has been charged with this fault, it carries that stigma for life. Therefore, "hard-mouth" should become the Judges' verdict only when there is incontrovertible proof of it. In most cases, torn skin or flesh, alone, is not sufficient since damage of this type may be caused in a variety of ways, such as by sharp sticks and stones, etc., in the cover. Usually crushed bone structure can be accepted as trustworthy and sufficient evidence of "hard-mouth”. Pigeons with broken backs may not be a case of “hard mouth” since this type of damage may occur when the bird falls on hard or stony ground. Various types of inconclusive evidence should merely be recorded by the Judge pending the manner in which the dog handles game in subsequent Runs.
If a dog is found to have demonstrated “extreme hard-mouth” it should be eliminated from the Stake. For damage to game not amounting to “extreme hard mouth”, a deduction of up to 10 points per incident may be applied. A cumulative penalty should be applied where damage to more than one item of game has occurred. When a dog has reached a total of 20 points for damage to game over the course of a trial, ANKC Rule No 58 should be applied, and the dog disqualified.
Other faults are frequently confused with "hard-mouth," although, in reality, they are entirely separate and distinct from it. "Freezing," in particular, falls into this category. A hard-mouthed dog may be gentle at delivery and, certainly, a sticky delivery does not imply hard-mouth. "Rolling-a-bird" or "mouthing" it, while making the retrieve, may be erroneously associated with "hard-mouth" in the opinion of some, even though the bird is not damaged. . If such "mouthing" is a fault at all, then it is of only minor importance.
ANKC Rule 7 (p) states;
Obedience - The spontaneous action of obeying all commands. Dogs should act readily and not cower or cringe at their handler's signs, sounds or commands.
Judges should look for obedience and steadiness not only between the pegs, but throughout the complete Run. The 10 point allocation for steadiness, obedience and walking to heel should be limited to behaviour “between the pegs”.
ANKC Rule 7 (r) states;
Retrieving - The retrieving covers the performance of the dog from when ordered to retrieve until it delivers the game to its handler.
Judges should be looking for eagerness both on the way out and on the return, directness on the way out and on the return, marking ability, and use of nose, ears and eyes.
ANKC Rule No 16 states;
Double Fall Retrieve. First game is cast as a mark from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve, the second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The first game cast must be retrieved before the second. The second game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line of the first and not less than forty metres from the firing point. This retrieve is restricted to "All Age" and "Championship Stakes".
Seeks to simulate a natural hunting situation wherein a dog marks the fall of game and is sent to make the retrieve. As the dog is making its way towards the fallen game, other game lurking nearby flushes and is shot by the handler. The well trained dog should stop shot and acknowledge the fall of the second item of game before returning to its original task, with or without a command from its handler. Judges are reminded of the requirements listed in ANKC Rule 16, and especially that the first item of game to be retrieved, must be a cast as a Mark. Furthermore, for this retrieve to “work”, the dog must be in a position to see the second item of game cast or to hear it fall. When a dog’s attention is focused on retrieving the first item of game, its ability to see the second item of game cast will be severely constrained, especially if it must solely rely on its peripheral vision. It is therefore desirable that, relative to the line from the Firing Point to the first item of game and the position of the dog, the angle to the second item of game should not exceed 60 degrees. Casting the second item of game while dogs are descending a hill should also be avoided. The use of a duck call a precursor to casting the second item of game is worthy of serious consideration as it introduces an ambit of equality for all dogs as does conducting this test in water.
ANKC Rule 22 states;
On multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order of retrieving. Any reasonable combination of the listed retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any retrieve.
Rules 8 through 21 describe the format for the range of retrieves permitted in any Run. Rule 22 allows for any reasonable combination of the prescribed retrieves, provided always that no more than three items of game shall be picked up in any one Run. When a Judge uses Rule 22 to build a so called “triple”, Judges are encouraged to describe the test in terms of the specific Retrieves used to construct the Run e.g. A Single Mark Retrieve coupled with a Double Blind Retrieve.
ANKC Rule 23 states;
(a) In Championship and All Age Stakes, a judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast, which is not to be retrieved by the competing dog.
(b) If any dog at any time picks up an article of game other than the nominated one it should be eliminated from further competition.
The circumstances applicable to the use of a “Diversionary Bird” or “No-No Bird” (see Rule 23 (a) above) are open to a wide range of interpretations. Accordingly, Judges shall ensure that situations surrounding its use complies with the criteria that it “emulates as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting”. A Diversionary or No-No Bird should not be placed in line with game that is to be retrieved or within 15m of that game and/or the line to it.
ANKC Rule 23 (b) should be read and implemented in conjunction with ANKC Rule 90 which states; Dogs retrieving any feather or fur, other than the object designated to be retrieved, and deemed by the Judge to have been picked up in the area of the run, will be run again without penalty.
ANKC Rule 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.
Dogs cannot mark the fall of game it cannot or did not see. In setting “Marks”, Judges should be mindful of the need for equality for all competitors and should take into account such factors as; the nature and contrast of the background against which the flight of the bird is visualized, the prevailing light conditions, as well as the height to which the birds are thrown. The position of the sun relative to the line of sight of a mark shoul
2004 amendments proposed by ACTCA RAFT Committee
Rule No.1
Current Rule
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions which emulate as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
Proposed Rule
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions that would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
Rationale
Deleting the words “which emulate as closely as possible those which” does not change the spirit or intention of Rule No1, but does recognise the Trials in their current form do not emulate shooting conditions as closely as possible, which in turn would imply significantly shorter runs.
Rule No 2
Current Rule
All events shall be restricted to dogs six months of age and over. The age of all dogs is computed from the date of their birth to the date on which the trial commences. Should finalisation of the trial be delayed, then the increase in age shall not affect the eligibility of the qualified contestants.
Proposed Rule
All events shall be restricted to dogs six months of age and over. The age of a dog shall be computed from its date of birth to the date on which the Trial commences. Should finalisation of the Trial be delayed, then the increase in age shall not affect the eligibility of any qualified contestant.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.
Rule No 3
Current Rule
In these Rules "Gundogs and Retrievers" shall be taken as referring to all Pure Bred Gundog varieties as accepted by the Member Body. The word "dog" shall include both sexes.
Registered (Main and Limited) desexed Gundogs shall be permitted to compete in Retrieving Trials in all States and/or Territories of Australia.
Proposed Rule
Registered (Main and Limited) desexed Gundogs shall be permitted to compete in Retrieving Trials in all States and/or Territories of Australia.
Rationale
The first paragraph would be reworded and incorporated into Rule No 7 – Definitions, thereby clarifying Rule No1 and cleaning up Rule No3.
New Rule 7 (t)
Gundog - shall be taken to mean a registered pure bred dog of a variety accepted by a Member Body as a Gundog.
New Rule 7 (u)
Dog – shall be taken to mean a Gundog of either sex.
Rule No 4
Current Rule
Directives of a Member Body shall apply to a Retrieving Trial in that State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of National Trials, and in the event of any inconsistency the Rules of the ANKC shall apply.
At a National Retrieving Trial Championship the only Rules that shall apply are the Rules for the conduct of Retrieving Trials as approved by the ANKC.
Proposed Rule
Directives of a Member Body shall apply to Retrieving Trials in their State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of National Trials, and in the event of any inconsistency the Rules of the ANKC shall apply.
New Rule
At a National Retrieving Trial Championship the only Rules that shall apply are the Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs, as approved by the ANKC.
Rationale
The proposed change amplifies the distinction between local Rules and those applicable to the National Championship.
Rule No 5
Current Rule
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. He should sit quietly with handler, or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by his handler until sent to retrieve. When ordered a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground, and should deliver, tenderly to hand. He should then await further orders.
Proposed Rule
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. It should sit quietly with the handler or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by the handler, until sent to retrieve. When ordered a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground. It should deliver tenderly to hand and then await further orders from the handler.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.
Rule No 6
Current Rule
The Shooting and Game Laws of each State or Territory must be observed and will govern the conduct of all Trials in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations of each State or Territory Member Body.
Proposed Rule
The Shooting with Firearms and Game Laws of each State and/or Territory must be observed and will govern the conduct of all Trials in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations of each State or Territory Member Body and the ANKC.
Rationale
The proposed change clarifies the laws referred to, updates the language used and is consistent with the recommended changes to Rule No 4.
Rule No 7(c)
Current Rule
Breaking Fence - The act on the part of a dog, when walking to heel, of going through, over or under a fence, without order. All dogs should remain steady at both sides of the fence through or over which their handlers are crossing.
Proposed Rule
Breaking Fence – Is the act on the part of a dog, when walking to heel, of going through, over or under a fence, without order. A dog should remain steady at both sides of a fence through or over which its handler is crossing.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.
Rule No 7 (g)
Current Rule
Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge and Field Steward for the purpose of commencing a run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
Proposed Rule
Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge for the purpose of commencing a Run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
Rationale
A competitor is solely under the control of the Judge, see Rule No 58.
Rule No 7 (j)
Current Rule
Game - Definition of - Quail, Duck, Snipe, Rabbits, Hare, Pigeons and Pheasants. The game shown above shall include any imported game bird which may be released from time to time and has established itself in the wild.
Proposed Rule
Game – the game used in Trials may include native game including quail and duck and/or introduced game that has established itself in the wild in Australia including rabbits, hare, pigeon and pheasant.
Rationale
The current Rule does not provide a clear definition and reference to snipe has been removed since they can no longer be hunted in Australia.
Rule No 8
Current Rule
Single Mark Retrieve shall be a retrieve where only one object of game is cast and is to be retrieved.
Proposed Rule
A Mark Retrieve – is a retrieve in which an item game is cast, from concealed cover, so that it can be seen by the dog while it is in the air and as it falls. A Mark Retrieve may be on land or in and/or through water. On a Mark Retrieve a dog should not need direction from its handler once it has been sent to recover game.
Rationale
The proposed changes raise the profile of the definition to address the current latitude in the interpretation of Rule 24.
Rule No 9
Current Rule
A Walk-Up Retrieve is one where the dog is walking at heel, the game is cast and shot at. Immediately the handler pauses to fire, the dog shall sit, drop or stand steady until ordered by handler to retrieve. A walk up is not permitted in a Novice or Puppy Stake or a Beginners Test.
Proposed Rule
A Walk-Up Retrieve is a Mark Retrieve wherein the game is cast while the dog is walking at heel. Immediately the handler pauses to fire at the game, the dog shall sit, stand or drop and remain steady until ordered by its handler to retrieve. A Walk-up Retrieve is not permitted in a Puppy Stake or a Beginners Test. In Novice Stakes the cast and fall of the game should generally be in line with the direction the handler has been directed to walk.
Rationale
The proposed wording emphasises that this retrieve is a variant of a Mark Retrieve and that its reintroduction into Novice Stakes is not inconsistent with a capabilities of a well trained Novice dog.
Rule No 10 (a)
Current Rule
Wounded Bird Retrieve - Bird to be thrown by Steward as in other retrieves, but to have line attached by which it is dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. Bird then picked up and fresh bird left in its stead.
Proposed Rule
Wounded Bird Retrieve – A bird to which a line has been attached is cast as in a Mark Retrieve. The bird is subsequently dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. This bird then picked up by a Steward and a fresh bird left in its stead for the dog to later retrieve.
Rationale
The proposed wording seeks to clarify the conduct of this type of retrieve. That said the ACTCA RAFT believes that this type of retrieve should be deleted since it is not possible to maintain an ambit of equality for all dogs as items of game a repeatedly dragged over the same ground. If the balance of option is to retain this style of retrieve it should be seen as a test of steadiness rather than a tracking test.
Rule 10(b)
Current Rule
Wounded Rabbit Retrieve - Rabbit to be placed by Steward as in other retrieves, but to have line attached by which it is dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. Rabbit is then picked up and fresh rabbit left in its stead.
Proposed Rule
Wounded Rabbit Retrieve – Rabbit, to which a line has been attached, is placed at a location nominated by the Judge. The rabbit is subsequently dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. This rabbit is then picked up by a Steward up and a fresh rabbit left in its stead for the dog to later recover.
Rationale
The proposed wording seeks to clarify the conduct of this type of retrieve. That said the ACTCA RAFT believes that this type of retrieve should be deleted since it is not possible to maintain an ambit of equality for all dogs as items of game a repeatedly dragged over the same ground. If the balance of option is to retain this style of retrieve then it should be seen as a test of steadiness rather than a tracking test and appropriate words should be added to the Rule to reflect this view.
Rule 11
Current Rule
A Blind Find Retrieve shall be a retrieve where a dog is in such a position that the flight, fall or placement of the game cannot be seen. The Judge may direct the dog to be placed behind a hide in close proximity to the Firing Point. Where possible it is recommended that the hide be part of the natural terrain or be constructed of natural materials.
Proposed Rule
A Blind Find Retrieve shall be a retrieve where a dog is in such a position that the flight, fall or placement of the game cannot be seen. The Judge may direct the dog to be placed behind a hide in close proximity to the Firing Point. Where possible it is recommended that the hide be part of the natural terrain or alternatively man-made portable hides should be used. .
Rationale
Natural hides require destruction of vegetation or modification of trials sites, which we should be seeking to avoid. Hay bails or cloth hides are adequate and emulate a hunting situation.
Rule No 12
Current Rule
A Double Mark Retrieve shall consist of two (2) marked retrieves and may include land and water. Except where the game is cast in a common area, game shall not be cast simultaneously and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Proposed Rule
A Double Mark Retrieve shall consist of two (2) Mark Retrieves and may include land and water. Except where the game is cast in a common area, game shall not be cast simultaneously and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Rationale
Editorial change to incorporate consistent terminology.
Rule No 13
Current Rule
A Double Blind Retrieve. The game will be located as in a double mark, with the game being placed so that the dog cannot sight them.
Proposed Rule
A Double Blind Find Retrieve. Two items of game will be separately located as for a Blind Find Retrieve and angular separation between the two items of game shall be at least 10 degrees in the case of All Age and Championship Stakes and at least 45 degrees in a Restricted Stake.
Rationale
The distances and lines that are acceptable for a Double Mark Retrieve are not the same for a Double Blind Find Retrieve. A certain minimum separation needs to be defined so that the two items of game cannot effectively be in line. This separation needs to be considerably wider in Restricted so the dog is being asked to look in a substantially different direction for each blind.
Rule No14
Current Rule
A Double Rise Retrieve shall consist of a retrieve where one object of game is cast and two shots fired in succession, before the dog is sent to retrieve and whilst the dog is returning with game, another object of game is cast or placed no further than approximately ten (10) metres from the fall of the game but at a greater distance form the firing point. The second game shall be retrieved immediately after the first game is delivered to hand. The second leg should not be treated as a blind.
Proposed Rule
A Double Rise Retrieve shall consist of a retrieve where one item of game is cast as for a Mark Retrieve at which two shots are fired in quick succession and before the dog is sent to retrieve. While the dog is returning with the first item of game, a second item of game is cast or placed approximately ten (10) metres from the fall of the first item of game, but at a greater distance from the Firing Point. The second item of game shall be retrieved immediately after the first item of game is delivered to hand. The second leg should not be treated as a Blind Find Retrieve.
Rationale
Large editorial changes and use of consistent terminology
Rule No 15
Current Rule
A Two-Bird Retrieve. First game is cast from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While dog is returning to handler with game, the second game is cast and a shot fired, so that the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The second game should be at least twenty metres from first game and not less than forty metres from the firing point.
Proposed Rule
A Two-Bird Retrieve. The first item of game shall be cast as for a Mark Retrieve, or alternatively, it may be cast or placed as for a Blind Find Retrieve. In accordance with instructions from the Judge, the dog shall be sent to recover this item of game. While dog is returning to the handler with the first item of game, a second item of game shall be cast so that the dog may mark its fall. The second item of game should be at least twenty metres from first item of game and not less than forty metres from the firing point.
Rationale
The amended working permits the first item of game to be recovered to be either a Mark Retrieve or a Blind Find Retrieve.
Rule No 16
Current Rule
Double Fall Retrieve. First game is cast as a mark from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve, the second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The first game cast must be retrieved before the second. The second game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line of the first and not less than forty metres from the firing point. This retrieve is restricted to “All Age” and "Championship Stakes".
Proposed Rule
Double Fall Retrieve. The first item of game is cast as a Mark Retrieve and at which one shot is fired. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve the first item of game, a second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of this item of game. The first item of game must be retrieved before the second item of game. The second item of game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line to the first item of game and not less than forty metres from the Firing Point. This retrieve is limited to All Age and Championship Stakes.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity.
Rule No 17
Current Rule
A Mark and Blind Retrieve shall consist of one marked retrieve and one blind find and may include land and water.
Proposed Rule
A Mark and Blind Retrieve shall consist of one Mark Retrieve and one Blind Find Retrieve.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No18
Current Rule
A Triple Mark shall consist of three marked retrieves. The game may be thrown at different angles and should be at least twenty metres apart and include land and water, terrain permitting. One retrieve should be at a fairly short distance. Game shall not be cast simultaneously, and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Proposed Rule
A Triple Mark shall consist of three separate Mark Retrieves. The items of game may be cast at different angles and shall be at least twenty metres apart and may include land and water, terrain permitting. One retrieve should be at a fairly short distance. Items of game shall not be cast simultaneously, and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No 19
Current Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Blinds and one Marked shall consist of two blind retrieves as for a Double and one marked retrieve.
Proposed Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Blinds and one Mark shall consist of a Double Blind Find Retrieve and a Mark Retrieve.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No 20
Current Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Marked and one Blind as previously described.
Proposed Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Marks and one Blind shall consist of a Double Mark Retrieve and a Blind Find Retrieve.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.
Rule No 21
Current Rule
Through or Amongst Decoy Retrieves. No less than six decoys constructed of plastic or painted wood shall be used. The decoys should be anchored individually. Any dog that picks up a decoy and does not immediately release it without command shall be marked no score. A dog which becomes entangled in the strings and attempts to free itself should not be penalised.
Proposed Rule
Through or Amongst Decoy Retrieves. No less than six decoys, constructed of plastic or painted wood, shall be used. The decoys should be anchored individually. Any dog that picks up a decoy and does not immediately release it without command shall be marked with No Score. A dog which becomes entangled in the strings and attempts to break free shall not be penalised.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity.
Rule No 22
Current Rule
On multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order of retrieving. Any reasonable combination of the listed retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any retrieve.
Note: The direction to the Game Steward to cast the game shall be given by the Judge. Where applicable, such direction shall be given from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.
Proposed Rule
In multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order in which items of game shall be recovered. Any reasonable combination of the listed Retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any Run.
New Rule
The direction to the Game Steward to cast the game shall be given by the Judge. Where applicable, such direction shall be given from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.
Rule No 23 (a)
Current Rule
In Championship and All Age Stakes, a judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast, which is not to be retrieved by the competing dog.
Proposed Rule
In All Age and Championship Stakes, a Judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast as a diversion and this item of game shall not be retrieved by the competing dog. Items of game used as a diversion shall not be located either “in line” with or at a distance of less than 20m from an item of game that is to be retrieved. See Rule “?” for the definition of “in line”.
Rationale
Largely editorial but also seeks to clarify the conditions under which a diversionary item of game may be used.
Rule No 23 (b)
Current Rule
If any dog at any time picks up an article of game other than the nominated one it should be eliminated from further competition.
Proposed Rule
While in competition, if a dog picks up an item of game used in connection with the Trial, other than the nominated item of game, it shall be awarded No Score. In the event of a dog picking up an item of game not being used in connection with the test, it shall be given a re-run without penalty.
Rationale
Clarifies what is meant by the term “eliminated” and overcomes shortfalls in the current wording of Rule No 90, which should be deleted.
Rule No 24
Current Rule
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 24.
Rationale
Rule No 8 adequately describes the requirements for a Mark Retrieve.
Rule No 26
Current Rule
On Marked Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the judge and may be considered a test of control, i.e. a handling test.
Proposed Rule
On Mark Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the Judge and this aspect may be considered to be a test of control. Prior to sending the dog, a handler is permitted to indicate clearly to the dog which item of game it is to recover and further handling should be penalised accordingly.
Rationale
Multiple Mark Retrieves should not be treated by the handler as though they are multiple Blind Find Retrieves, but the Rule, as it now stands, could be seen to imply this. The present wording is open to misinterpretation.
Rule No 28
Current Rule
On Blind Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Retrieve on the initial line from his handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period cannot be said to be under control.
Proposed Rule
On Blind Find Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Find Retrieve on the initial line from its handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Find Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period of time cannot be said to be under control.
Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.
Rule No 29
Current Rule
Programmes must be so arranged that all dogs are thoroughly tested on land and in or through water of sufficient depth to require the dog to swim.
Proposed Rule
Programmes should be so arranged that all dogs are thoroughly tested on land and in or through water of sufficient depth to require the dog to swim.
Rationale
“Must” has been replaced with “should” to provide Judges with some degree of latitude in cases where water levels are low due to drought or when trials are conducted in flooded paddocks.
Rule No 30
Current Rule
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. It is desirable in a Novice Stake that runs be not more than 100 metres.
Proposed Rule
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. In a Novice Stake it is desirable that Runs not exceed 100 metres.
Rationale
Grammatical and editorial changes to improve clarity.
Rule No 31
Current Rule
No more than two (2) retrieves judged by the same judge may be run jointly.
Proposed Rule
No more than two (2) Runs judged by the same person/s may be linked as consecutive tests.
Rationale
Editorial changes to improve clarity.
Rule No 32
Current Rule
A "Stake" is a competition held at a Retrieving Trial and shall consist of not less than three (3) retrieves, with the exception of Puppy Stakes, which shall consist of two (2) retrieves. A Novice Stake shall consist of not less than three retrieves or more than four retrieves.
Proposed Rule
A "Stake" is a competition held at a Retrieving Trial and shall consist of not less than three (3) Runs, , with the exception of a Beginners Test, which shall consist of two (2) retrieves. A Novice Stake shall consist of not less than three Runs or more than four Runs.
Rationale
Age based Stakes are not viable in the Australian environment and should be deleted and replaced with a progression of events e.g. commencing with a Beginners Test, followed by a Novice Stake, a Restricted Stake, an All Age Stake and a Championship Stake.
Rule No 33
Current Rule
Puppy Stake is a stake confined to all Gundogs six (6) months of age and not exceeding twelve (12) months as at the date of the event.
Proposed Rule
Beginners Test is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won another Beginners Test or have placed in any other Stake. Beginners' Tests shall consist of two (2) Runs each of which is a Mark Retrieve, one (1) on land and one (1) in or through water.
Rationale
See Rationale attached to Rule No 32 above and this wording embraces Rule No 45 which should, as a consequence, be deleted.
Rule No 34
Current Rule
Novice Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have not won any stake other than two (2) Novice Stakes, Puppy Stakes and ‘Beginners' Tests excluded. A "Walk Up'' is not permitted in a Novice or Puppy Stake or Beginners' Test.
Proposed Rule
Novice Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won two (2) Novice Stakes (Beginners’ Tests excluded). A “Walk up” is permitted in a Novice Stake as per Rule 9.
Rationale
Changes in the 1st sentence are to make the eligibility requirements clearer. The second sentence is changed to align the Rule Book with our proposed change to
Rule No 9.
Rule No 35
Current Rule
Derby Stake is a stake confined to all Gundogs six (6) months of age and not exceeding two (2) years as at the date of the event.
Note: Work for Derby Stakes must not include blind finds. Work for Novice and Puppy Stakes must be single-marked retrieves, and importance must be placed on arranging runs with clear marking. All events shall be restricted to dogs six (6) months or over.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule 35 in its entirety.
Rationale
Age based Stakes are not viable in the Australian environment and should be deleted and replaced with a progression of events e.g. commencing with a Beginners Test, followed by a Novice Stake, a Restricted Stake, an All Age Stake and a Championship Stake.
Rule No 36
Current Rule
Restricted Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have not won three (3) Restricted Stakes or an All Age Stake or been placed first or second in a Championship Stake.
Proposed Rule
Restricted Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won five (5) Restricted Stakes or an All Age Stake or been placed first or second in a Championship Stake. At least one Blind Find Retrieve shall be included in a Restricted Stake. It is preferable that the Blind Find Retrieve should be completed after, rather than before, a Mark Retrieve, Double Rise or Two-Bird Retrieve. In the same Run, if a Blind Find is to be completed ahead of a Mark Retrieve, the angle of separation between the two items of game shall not be less than 45 degrees.
Rationale
There is a significant gap between the levels of performance expected of All Age dogs and those competing at Restricted Stake level. Competitors from States experiencing low entry numbers are finding that dogs are being forced to compete at All Age level before they have gained sufficient experience. Increasing the number of permissible wins is seen as viable approach to allow these dogs to gain the requisite experience. The requirement for three (3) Restricted Stake wins for a dog to gain its RRD title would be retained so competitors in States with larger entries will not be significantly disadvantaged. An angular separation of 45 degrees is considered more than adequate for dogs of this standard.
Rule No 37
Current Rule
All Age Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have won a Novice or have been placed first, second or third in a Restricted Stake. A blind find must be included.
Proposed Rule
All Age Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have won a Novice Stake or have been placed first, second or third in a Restricted Stake. A Blind Find Retrieve must be included and the number of Runs shall not exceed four (4).
Rationale
Some States are conducting Championship events limited to four Runs and at the same time some Club’s are conducting All Age events with up to five (5) Runs. This imbalance can distort the perception of the relative performance of the winning dogs.
Rule No 38
Current Rule
Championship Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have been placed first in a Restricted or first, second or third in an All Age Stake. A Championship Stake shall consist of not less than four (4) retrieves, with at least nine (9) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) blind finds are to be included.
A dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide at least once.
Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits and at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship.
Proposed Rule
Championship Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have been placed first in a Restricted Stake or first, second or third in an All Age Stake. A Championship Stake shall consist of not less than six (6) Runs, with at least thirteen (13) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) Blind Find Retrieves shall be included and a dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a Hide on at least one occasion during the course of the event.
Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits, at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship Stake.
Rationale
The increase in the minimum number of Runs is designed to establish a clear distinction between All Age and Championship Stakes.
Rule No 39
Current Rule
Retrieving Trial Champions are eligible only for Championship. All Age and Derby Stakes.
Proposed Rule
Retrieving Trial Champions are eligible only for Championship and All Age Stakes.
Rationale
Editorial change and the amendment wording is in keeping with the recommendation to delete Derby Stakes in their entirety.
Rule No 40
Current Rule
National Championship Retrieving Trial shall consist of not less than seven (7) retrieves with at least fifteen (15) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) blinds are to be included.” A retrieve containing a blind find "leg" is not acceptable unless the dog is tested for steadiness from behind a hide.
A dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide at least twice.
Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits and at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship.
No other Retrieving Trial carrying Championship points may be conducted throughout Australia on the same day as a National Championship Retrieving Trial.
Proposed Rule
National Championship Retrieving Trial shall consist of not less than eight 8 Runs with at least seventeen 17 items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) Blind Find Retrieves are to be included and a dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide on at least two (2) occasions. .
Note: A minimum of twelve (12) bona fide exhibits and at least eight 8 different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a National Championship.
No other Retrieving Trial carrying Championship points may be conducted throughout Australia on the same day as a National Championship Retrieving Trial.
Rationale
The increase in the minimum number of Runs and items of game to be retrieved is designed to establish a clear distinction between a Championship Stake and a National Championship Retrieving Trial.
Rule No 41
Current Rule
Brace Stake is a stake for two (2) dogs of different breeds or two (2) dogs of the same breed, provided they are registered Gundogs and the bona fide property of the one (1) owner.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 41 in its entirety.
Rationale
A Brace Stake is not relevant in the Australian environment.
Rule No 42
Current Rule
Team Stake is a stake for three (3) dogs of the same or different breeds provided they are the bona fide property of the one (1) owner.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 42 in its entirety
Rationale
A Team Stake is not relevant in the Australian environment.
Rule No 45
Current Rule
Beginners' Tests - Are tests provided for dogs that have never been placed in any Stake or which have never won any other Beginners' Test or Water Test.
Beginners' Tests shall consist of two (2) single-marked retrieves, one (1) on land and one (1) in or through water.
Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 45 in its entirety
Rationale
Context included in proposed changes to Rule No 33.
Rules 46-47-48-49-50 each relate to Water Tests
Current Rules Nos.
46. A Water Test shall consist of two (2) retrieves, one (1) to be from water and one (1) across water and both to be single-marked retrieves.
47. Novice Water Test is a test for dogs which have not won any Water Test or Retrieving Trial Stake or been placed first or second in a Retrieving Trial Championship Stake (Beginners’ Test excluded).
48. Restricted Water Test is a test for dogs which have not won an All Age Water test or an All Age Stake Retrieving Trial or have been place first or second in a Championship Stake Retrieving Trial.
49 All Age Water Test is a test for dogs without restriction to age or previous performance, except that Retrieving Trial Champions cannot compete.
50. Any Judge holding a Novice Licence or higher shall be eligible to judge any Water Test.
Proposed Rule
The proposal is to delete Rules 46-50 inclusive.
Rationale
These events are rarely staged and no longer serve a useful purpose. Their deletion would bring the Rule book into line with alterations to other Field Trial rules, which have had irrelevant material removed.
Rule No 56
Current Rule
No owner or handler shall be permitted to withdraw a dog from a stake on the field or at any time during the progress of the stake, without the consent of the Judge, and without advising a Steward. Any owner or handler withdrawing his dog or dogs without such consent may be debarred from any further Trials or penalised according to the circumstances by the Committee of the Member Body.
Proposed Rule
No owner or handler shall be permitted to withdraw a dog from a Stake or at any time during the progress of the Stake, without the consent of the Judge (which will not be unreasonably withheld) and without advising a Steward. Any owner or handler withdrawing a dog or dogs without consent may be debarred from any further Trials or penalised according to the circumstances by the Committee of the Member Body.
Rationale
As a matter of courtesy an owner and/or handler should seek the Judge’s permission to withdraw any dog from a Stake, similarly, the Judge should not be in a position to deny such a request. For example, a handler may be concerned for the safety of the dog in a particular Run and therefore wish to withdraw the dog from further competition. It is undesirable to have a situation whereby the Judge could deny such a request.
Rule No 66
Current Rule
The person handling and hunting a dog may speak, whistle, and work it by hand as he may deem proper, but he may be called to order by the Judge for making any unnecessary noise or for any disorderly conduct, and if after being cautioned he persists in such noise or disorderly conduct, the Judge may order the dog to be taken up and it then shall be regarded as disqualified from the stake. An opponent's dog must not be interfered with or excited.
Proposed Rule
The person handling a dog may speak, whistle, and work it by hand as they deem proper, including using a hand to indicate to the dog which item of game it is to retrieve, but may be called to order by the Judge for making any unnecessary noise or for any disorderly conduct, and if after being cautioned they persist with such noise or disorderly conduct, the Judge may order the dog to be taken up and it then shall be regarded as being disqualified from the Stake.
Rationale
Dogs are not “hunted” in a Retrieving Trial and the revised wording further clarifies the situation of when a handler elects to use a hand cue to indicate to the dog which item of game it is to retrieve.
Rule No 86
Current Rule
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay shall return direct to the handler and shall deliver straight to hand in front of the handler from standing or sitting position, and as instructed by the Judge. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.
Proposed Rule
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay return directly to the handler and shall deliver, within hand’s reach of the handler (e.g. in front of or at the handler’s side), from standing or sitting position. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.
Rationale
Dog’s should be allowed to deliver anywhere within a tight semi-circle from the left to the right side heeling position of the handler. While delivering to the side, dogs often demonstrate that they have remembered the location of other game by aligning themselves in the relevant direction.
Rule No 103
Current Rule
The title of Novice Retrieving Trial Dog (N.R.D.) and/or Restricted Retrieving Trial Dog (R.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs which are no longer eligible to compete in those stakes because of wins in those stakes or wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule will be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)
Proposed Rule
The title of Novice Retrieving Trial Dog (N.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs that are no longer eligible to compete in Novice Stakes because of wins in those Stakes or wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule will be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)
New Rule
The Restricted Retrieving Trial Dog (R.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs that have won three (3) Restricted Stakes or are no longer eligible to compete at this level because of wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule shall be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)
Rationale
In the interests of advancing the sport and to assist handlers and/or dogs gain additional experience before being excluded from competing at Restricted level, it has been recommended (see proposed Rule No 36) that the total number of Restricted wins be increased to five (5). Nevertheless, it is felt that the number of wins at Restricted level necessary to gain the RRD Title should not be increased fro the current criteria.
Rule No 113
Current Rule
Judges shall not show their sheets to any unauthorised person. The sheets must be retained by the judge. Judge's Sheets must be checked and signed by the Judge and Chief Steward and the points announced for all place awards at the conclusion of the Trial.
Should any competitor request details of how he was scored on any retrieve, the judge may make this information available to that competitor. The Judge may, at his discretion, show a competitor his/her score sheet.
Proposed Rule
Judges shall not show their sheets to unauthorised persons. The sheets must be retained by the Judge. Judge's Sheets must be checked and signed by the Judge and Chief Steward and at the conclusion of the Trial and the aggregate points shall be announced for all place awards.
As a minimum, at the conclusion of the presentation of trophies, the Run by Run scores of all dogs completing the Trial shall be made available to interested parties.
Should any competitor failing to complete the Trial request details of how he/she was scored on any Run, the Judge shall make this information available to that competitor. The Judge may, at his discretion, show a competitor his/her score sheet.
Rationale
Under current Rules and practice, a Retrieving Trial is possibly the only competition in Australia where a competitor’s progress throughout the Trial is known only to the Judge. It is considered that the sport would benefit from adopting a more transparent approach. This could be achieved by making the Run by Run scores of all competitors completing the Trial available for the information of interested parties. The proposed approach does not create any additional work on behalf of the Judge or Officials since the scores of all competitors completing the Trial are routinely tallied in order to establish the final outcome of the Trial.
New Rule
Items of game shall be considered to be “in line” when the angle of separation is less than 11 degrees. In practical terms, 11 degrees equates to a 10 metre separation at a distance of 50 metres; a 20 metre separation at a distance of 100 metres and a 30 metre separation at a distance of 150 metres. The Judge shall not specify the order of pick-up if items of game are deemed to be “in line” and that decision shall be left to the handler’s discretion.
Rationale
It is considered that in situations where items of game are deliberately cast or placed “in line” and the Judge specifies that the “back” item of game is to be retrieved first, the scenario calls for levels of control that are outside the spirit of the sport. There is a widely held view that Runs of this type are designed to eliminate competitors rather than to produce fair competition that can be assessed in an appropriate manner and suitable safeguards are required.
Proposed Change to Score Sheet
Change
Amend the Score Sheet to include a new category entitled “Breaking from the Hide” with a deduction of up to 5 points.
Rationale
Over time this misdemeanour has not been treated in a consistent manner by all Judges and has been assessed under a variety of categories including; Steadiness, Obedience and Walking to Heel; Breaking to Shot and Failure to Obey Command and Direction. Creating a dedicated category is seen as an appropriate solution this dilemma. The recommendation that the penalty be limited to a maximum of 5 points was reached after considering the relative importance of;
a. Breaking to Shot - max 10 points
b. Hard mouth - max 10 points
c. Blinking and over-running game - max 5 points
d. Dropping game - max 5 points, and
e. Not firing from the shoulder - max 5 points
Breaking from the hide, either before or after the shot is fired (but before the dog is called by the handler), is assessed as a lesser fault than a. and b. above and more in keeping with faults c, d, and e.
Restructure of the Rule Book
In its present form related Rules are not always presented together and this makes for difficult reading and understanding, particularly for new-comers to the sport. A number of Rules include Notes and their status in not clear. Perhaps they should be made into separate and distinct Rules.
Reordering the Rules Book along the following lines is recommended and bringing it to fruition may require a Working Party to be established in which the ACTCA is filling to participate.
Purpose (Rules 1, 5, 27, 4, and 6)
Definition of Terms (Rule 7)
Retrieves (Rules 8, 24, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 30, 22, 26, 29, 23, 25, 26, 28, 31)
Stakes and Eligibility (Rules 2, 3, 32, 45, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, 44)
Required entries (Rules 51, notes 38, and 40)
Judges (Rules 111, 71, 72, 73,)
Duties of Trial manager and stake managers (Rule 92)
Duties of Gun steward (Rule 93f)
Duties of Game stewards (Rule 93a-e,g)
General Regulations for Conduct of a Trial (Rules 52, 60, 58, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75)
Procedure for Conducting Trials (Rules 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91),
Method of Scoring (Rules 112, 113, 114, Score Sheet)
Awards (Rules 110b, 110a, 97, 98, 99, 110, 101, 102, 94, 95, 104, 105, 106)
Titles (Rules 103, 107, 108, 109).
New Rule
The title of RT Grand Champion may be awarded to any dog that is awarded at total of 120 Championship points, of which not less than eighteen 18 have been awarded in Championship Stakes.
The title of RT Grand Championship will not be awarded to dogs retrospectively, but a dog will be eligible to be awarded the title of RT Grand Champion, if it gains a minimum of twelve (12) points towards the title of RT Grand Champion (120 points) on or after the implementation date of 1.1.2005.
Rationale
To place Retrieving Trial titles on a comparable to those in the “conformation world” and is a just and fitting reward for outstanding achievement in the field. The requirement to gain at least eighteen points in Championship Stakes requires significant merit and ensures that the title of RT Grand Champion will not be obtained simply because a Member State has fewer dogs in competition.
Document entitled “Guidelines for Judges”
For some time there has been considerable interest in having developed a document containing a series of guidelines for Judges. The ACTCA RAFT has responded to this need and the following draft document is attached for consideration and implementation. It is acknowledged that it will be extremely difficult to gain universal acceptance of every facit contained in the draft document, nevertheless, it should be recognised that its contents are only “guidelines” and do not alter, or in any other way impact on, the official ANKC Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs. The guidelines are there to promote a level of consistency across the country in the conduct of Trials, the standard of Runs, interpretations of the Rules and the principles underpinning the assessment of the performance of dogs in competition.
It may be necessary for the National RAFT Committee to establish a Working Party to bring together the final document. Members of the Working Party will need to be computer literate and have ready access to the appropriate resources, if the “Guidelines for Judges” document is to be finalised before 1 Jan 2005.
RETRIEVING TRIALS FOR GUNDOGS
Guidelines for Judges
Preamble
Directives issued by a Member Body shall apply to a Retrieving Trial in that State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of the National Trial, but in the event of any inconsistency, the Rules of the ANKC shall apply. At a National Retrieving Trial Championship only the ANKC Rules shall apply. Consequently, nothing contained in these Guidelines shall be considered as altering and/or amending the ANKC Rules in any way whatsoever. Recommendations relating to the interpretation and application of the Rules are therefore for guidance purposes aimed at promoting increased uniformity in the conduct of Retrieving Trials and the impartial assessment of the competitors.
The objectives of these Guidelines are twofold:
Firstly, to promote greater uniformity in the conduct of Retrieving Trials, including the standard of Runs set in the various Stakes; and
Secondly, to facilitate greater uniformity in how Judge’s assess the relative merits of dogs competing in Retrieving Trials. In respect to evaluating a dog’s performance, these Guidelines include a set of recommendations for grading the performance of dogs so that there will be greater uniformity in the penalties imposed for various faults.
Recommendations
ANKC Rule No 1 states;
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions which emulate as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
The phrase, “conditions which emulate as closely as possible to those which would be found whilst shooting” should be interpreted for the purposes of the Rules as “natural hunting conditions”. At all times Judges should be mindful of the requirement to “bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.” This includes, as far as is practical, ensuring that there are no significant changes in the colour of game especially that used for “marked retrieves”. Judges are encouraged to oversee the sorting of game in order to circumvent any difficulties that may arise and to maximize the “ambit of equality”.
.
ANKC Rule No 5 states;
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. It should sit quietly with the handler or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by its handler until sent to retrieve. When ordered, a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground, and should deliver, tenderly to hand. It should then await further orders.
ANKC Rule No 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from its handler.
ANKC Rule No 27 states;
A dog that marks the fall of a bird, used the wind, and will take direction from his handler is of great value.
Perhaps more than any others, Rule Nos 5 and 27 encapsulate the necessity for team work between handler and dog. A dog that has marked the fall of game and been sent to retrieve should, in general terms, require no further direction from the handler (ref ANKC Rule No 24). Deductions from a perfect score should be commensurate with the deficiencies shown in marking and memory.
Judges should be discouraged from setting Runs which are aimed at discounting the need for teamwork by consciously locating handlers in positions where they cannot help their dog. “Natural hunting conditions” are subject to great variation across the length and breadth of Australia, the work expected of dogs should not be subject to similar wide variations. In most instances, there should be little doubt in anyone’s mind as to the type of work that constitutes a perfect performance on any given Run. Nevertheless, there are unlimited opportunities for honest difference-of-opinion on the severity of the penalty to be applied to any given infraction or deviation from perfect work.
The possibility therefore exists for handlers to become confused and/or dismayed when their dog is not included in the placings due to faults, which a Judge in another Trial did not penalise so severely. However, this should be minimized, as everyone has the right to know which particular faults will be penalised severely, moderately, or only to a minor degree. It therefore follows that some clarification and/or guidance is required; hence, a variety of faults and their suggested classifications may be found at the back of this Guide.
ANKC Rule 7 (a) states;
Action and Style - These are both seen in a fearless, well-trained dog that covers its ground with good free movement, head well held, and tail swinging nicely from side to side.
The style and capabilities of each particular breed should be taken into account when making an assessment. Action and Style do not relate to speed alone. The assessment should take into account factors such as; how keen and willing is the dog to work with its handler and to promptly accept commands, how keen and willing is the dog to perform the act of retrieving.
ANKC Rule 7 (b) states;
Blinking - Any dog that finds and deliberately passes by the game, either through nervousness or bad training is a "blinker".
A dog that blinks game and then begins to hunt in the wrong area should be penalized 1 - 5 points. Indicators such as the dog pausing over game and looking back toward the handler should be used by the Judge to confirm that game has been ignored. The Judge must be certain in his/her mind that blinking has in fact occurred before applying the penalty and it is not simply a case of misjudgement by the dog or the Judge.
ANKC Rule 7 (d) states;
Breaking from the Hide - A dog will be deemed to have broken from the hide if he moves outside the area designated by the Judge as the hide. Any movement by the dog within the area of the hide shall be classed as unsteadiness only.
If a dog breaks from the hide to a position where it would be able to see the game placed, cast, or the handler firing at the game and is then replaced before the shot is fired – apply 5 point penalty.
Breaking to Shot from a Hide - if a dog breaks from the hide before a shot is fired, it is should be seen as being less steady than a dog that waits in the hide until it hears a shot (or two in the case of a Double Blind) and then breaks. It would therefore seem inconsistent to increase the penalty for this infraction over that discussed immediately above. By definition, there has been no attempt to retrieve (only to rejoin the handler) – apply a 5 point penalty.
If a dog moves from the hide, but stops in an area not insight of the handler or of game being cast or placed – may be returned to the hide and a deduction for unsteadiness would be applied – apply a penalty of 3 Points.
A dog moving from hide position before the shot is fired may be repositioned once only.
If a dog comes out of the hide and sees the blind being placed or game cast and is deemed to have gained an unfair advantage, it should be disqualified.
ANKC Rule 7 (e) states;
Breaking to Shot - If a dog makes a forward movement which in the opinion of the Judge indicates a deliberate attempt to retrieve without being ordered to do so, that dog shall be deemed to have broken. If a dog makes a slight break and is brought immediately under control it shall be penalised for unsteadiness.
Controlled Break - up to 5 points deduction (dog stopped in the field and redirected).
If the dog breaks and continues to retrieve – 10 point deduction.
ANKC Rules 7 (f, g& i) collectively state;
f) Control Area - is that area encompassed by the control point markers and the firing point markers.
g) Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge and Field Steward for the purpose of commencing a run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
i) Firing Point - is the point from which the handler will fire a gun and direct the dog to retrieve.
Note: Terrain permitting, the distance between the Control Point and the Firing Point shall be not less than ten metres and the distance between the two marker pegs at the Firing Point shall be not less than 1.5 metres.
Judges are encouraged to be very specific in their briefing to handlers on where they are to control their dog.
Handlers moving either forward or backward from the Firing Point should be penalized, accordingly, and this may even lead to receiving a zero score (No Score) – if it is deemed to be an attempt to gain an unfair advantage.
A dog that picks up a previously retrieved item of game prior to being sent for the next leg of a retrieve – 5 point penalty
N.B. A previously retrieved item of game refers to game retrieved by the dog in the current Run and not items of game that have been retrieved in other Runs and that have inadvertently been left where the dog may be tempted to retrieve them.
ANKC Rule No 7 (l) states;
Hard Mouth - A dog is deemed to be hard-mouthed when there is unmistakable evidence of any markings or damage on game retrieved due to biting or crunching by the dog. The penalty as defined on the score sheet should be relative to the marking or damage. Where there is deliberate squeezing of game so that the bones break and the Judge considers that the game is unfit for the table, the Judge may apply Rule 58 and disqualify the dog.
Note: Game can be marked when thrown and this should be considered.
A dog should be penalised for hard-mouth (damaging game), but, before doing so, the Judge should inspect the bird and be satisfied that the dog alone is responsible for the damage.
"Hard-mouth" is one of the most severely penalized faults in a retriever; furthermore, once a dog has been charged with this fault, it carries that stigma for life. Therefore, "hard-mouth" should become the Judges' verdict only when there is incontrovertible proof of it. In most cases, torn skin or flesh, alone, is not sufficient since damage of this type may be caused in a variety of ways, such as by sharp sticks and stones, etc., in the cover. Usually crushed bone structure can be accepted as trustworthy and sufficient evidence of "hard-mouth”. Pigeons with broken backs may not be a case of “hard mouth” since this type of damage may occur when the bird falls on hard or stony ground. Various types of inconclusive evidence should merely be recorded by the Judge pending the manner in which the dog handles game in subsequent Runs.
If a dog is found to have demonstrated “extreme hard-mouth” it should be eliminated from the Stake. For damage to game not amounting to “extreme hard mouth”, a deduction of up to 10 points per incident may be applied. A cumulative penalty should be applied where damage to more than one item of game has occurred. When a dog has reached a total of 20 points for damage to game over the course of a trial, ANKC Rule No 58 should be applied, and the dog disqualified.
Other faults are frequently confused with "hard-mouth," although, in reality, they are entirely separate and distinct from it. "Freezing," in particular, falls into this category. A hard-mouthed dog may be gentle at delivery and, certainly, a sticky delivery does not imply hard-mouth. "Rolling-a-bird" or "mouthing" it, while making the retrieve, may be erroneously associated with "hard-mouth" in the opinion of some, even though the bird is not damaged. . If such "mouthing" is a fault at all, then it is of only minor importance.
ANKC Rule 7 (p) states;
Obedience - The spontaneous action of obeying all commands. Dogs should act readily and not cower or cringe at their handler's signs, sounds or commands.
Judges should look for obedience and steadiness not only between the pegs, but throughout the complete Run. The 10 point allocation for steadiness, obedience and walking to heel should be limited to behaviour “between the pegs”.
ANKC Rule 7 (r) states;
Retrieving - The retrieving covers the performance of the dog from when ordered to retrieve until it delivers the game to its handler.
Judges should be looking for eagerness both on the way out and on the return, directness on the way out and on the return, marking ability, and use of nose, ears and eyes.
ANKC Rule No 16 states;
Double Fall Retrieve. First game is cast as a mark from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve, the second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The first game cast must be retrieved before the second. The second game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line of the first and not less than forty metres from the firing point. This retrieve is restricted to "All Age" and "Championship Stakes".
Seeks to simulate a natural hunting situation wherein a dog marks the fall of game and is sent to make the retrieve. As the dog is making its way towards the fallen game, other game lurking nearby flushes and is shot by the handler. The well trained dog should stop shot and acknowledge the fall of the second item of game before returning to its original task, with or without a command from its handler. Judges are reminded of the requirements listed in ANKC Rule 16, and especially that the first item of game to be retrieved, must be a cast as a Mark. Furthermore, for this retrieve to “work”, the dog must be in a position to see the second item of game cast or to hear it fall. When a dog’s attention is focused on retrieving the first item of game, its ability to see the second item of game cast will be severely constrained, especially if it must solely rely on its peripheral vision. It is therefore desirable that, relative to the line from the Firing Point to the first item of game and the position of the dog, the angle to the second item of game should not exceed 60 degrees. Casting the second item of game while dogs are descending a hill should also be avoided. The use of a duck call a precursor to casting the second item of game is worthy of serious consideration as it introduces an ambit of equality for all dogs as does conducting this test in water.
ANKC Rule 22 states;
On multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order of retrieving. Any reasonable combination of the listed retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any retrieve.
Rules 8 through 21 describe the format for the range of retrieves permitted in any Run. Rule 22 allows for any reasonable combination of the prescribed retrieves, provided always that no more than three items of game shall be picked up in any one Run. When a Judge uses Rule 22 to build a so called “triple”, Judges are encouraged to describe the test in terms of the specific Retrieves used to construct the Run e.g. A Single Mark Retrieve coupled with a Double Blind Retrieve.
ANKC Rule 23 states;
(a) In Championship and All Age Stakes, a judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast, which is not to be retrieved by the competing dog.
(b) If any dog at any time picks up an article of game other than the nominated one it should be eliminated from further competition.
The circumstances applicable to the use of a “Diversionary Bird” or “No-No Bird” (see Rule 23 (a) above) are open to a wide range of interpretations. Accordingly, Judges shall ensure that situations surrounding its use complies with the criteria that it “emulates as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting”. A Diversionary or No-No Bird should not be placed in line with game that is to be retrieved or within 15m of that game and/or the line to it.
ANKC Rule 23 (b) should be read and implemented in conjunction with ANKC Rule 90 which states; Dogs retrieving any feather or fur, other than the object designated to be retrieved, and deemed by the Judge to have been picked up in the area of the run, will be run again without penalty.
ANKC Rule 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.
Dogs cannot mark the fall of game it cannot or did not see. In setting “Marks”, Judges should be mindful of the need for equality for all competitors and should take into account such factors as; the nature and contrast of the background against which the flight of the bird is visualized, the prevailing light conditions, as well as the height to which the birds are thrown. The position of the sun relative to the line of sight of a mark shoul